EU AI Act transparency duties apply now; high-risk duties from December 2027. Check your exposure
Insights About us Careers
Contact us
Careers

Careers at iSpark

iSpark is an online AI services company based in India, working remotely with clients worldwide. This page lists the ten AI roles we hire for, what each one involves here rather than in the abstract, how our hiring process runs, and what we look for. Read it before you write to us and your application will be better than most.

Working model
Fully remote
Roles listed
10 AI disciplines
Process
Paid trial task, always

A note on what this page is and is not. It is a description of the ten disciplines we hire into and what the work looks like at a company that builds AI systems for clients rather than for itself. It is not a live vacancy board with a count of open seats. If one of these roles describes you, write to us with work we can look at and we will tell you honestly whether there is something open now or whether it is worth staying in touch.

In one paragraph

The ten roles below are the AI services jobs most in demand going into 2026, drawn from published hiring data and from what clients actually ask us to staff. Each one maps to a service pillar we deliver, so the work is real client engineering rather than internal research. Every role is remote, every role is assessed with a paid trial task, and every role involves talking to clients at some point.

The ten AI roles we hire for

These are ordered roughly by how often the discipline appears in client requirements, not by seniority or pay. The demand column cites published market signals where we have them. Treat those figures as directional: hiring indices measure job titles, and job titles in this field are notoriously inconsistent between companies.

RolePillar it sits inPublished demand signal
AI EngineerGenerative AI developmentLinkedIn placed AI engineer at the top of its 2026 fastest growing jobs list, with postings reported up roughly 143 percent year on year
Machine Learning EngineerMachine learning developmentA steady presence on every published AI hiring index since 2020, and still the role with the deepest supply of open positions across sectors
MLOps and AI Infrastructure EngineerMLOpsConsistently among the hardest AI roles to fill, and the constraint most often cited when a pilot fails to reach production
Data Engineer for AI readinessData engineeringThe most frequent starting point of our own engagements, and the stage where the majority of AI budget overruns originate
AI Solutions Architect and AI ConsultantAI consultingReported as the second fastest growing AI role on LinkedIn's 2026 list, and notable for a high median experience level of around eight years
NLP and LLM EngineerNLP servicesDemand has shifted rather than shrunk since large language models arrived, moving from model training toward retrieval, extraction and evaluation work
Computer Vision EngineerComputer visionSustained demand in manufacturing, logistics, healthcare imaging and agriculture, with the sharpest growth in inspection and monitoring applications
AI Governance and Compliance SpecialistAI governanceOne of the fastest growing specialisms in the field, with reported year on year growth near 45 percent as the EU AI Act obligations phase in
Conversational AI and AI Agent DeveloperAI agent developmentConversational AI hiring has been reported up around 71 percent year on year, with integration focused roles growing faster still
AI Product Designer and AI Product ManagerAI product designA growing category as organisations discover that model quality and product adoption are separate problems, with creative and multimodal briefs rising sharply

What follows is a longer description of each role as it exists here. If you recognise yourself in the bullet points rather than the job title, that is the right reason to write to us.

AI Engineer

The broadest role on this list and the one most in demand. An AI engineer at iSpark takes a business problem and assembles a working system from models, retrieval, tooling and ordinary software. In practice this is more software engineering than research: you spend your time on context assembly, prompt and tool design, latency, cost per request, caching, fallback paths and the evaluation harness that proves the thing works.

  • Building retrieval systems over client document sets, including chunking strategy, embedding choice and the reranking step most teams skip
  • Designing evaluation suites that catch confident wrong answers before a client does
  • Getting cost per request down by an order of magnitude without losing answer quality
  • Writing the integration layer between a model and the systems a client already runs

Machine Learning Engineer

Where the problem is prediction rather than generation, this is the role. Forecasting, classification, ranking, anomaly detection, recommendation and the unfashionable tabular work that quietly produces most of the measurable value in the field. The job is feature engineering, model selection, validation design and the discipline to resist a complicated architecture when a gradient boosted tree wins.

  • Building demand, churn, risk and maintenance models against real client data
  • Designing validation that reflects how the model will actually be used, including time based splits and group leakage checks
  • Quantifying uncertainty so a business user knows when not to trust a prediction
  • Retraining strategy, drift detection and the question of when a model should be retired

MLOps and AI Infrastructure Engineer

The reason AI projects survive. You own the path from a notebook to a service that runs at three in the morning without anyone watching. Pipelines, feature stores, model registries, reproducible training, deployment, rollback, monitoring and the alerting that tells a client their model has quietly drifted. It is the least glamorous work in the field and the highest leverage.

  • Standing up training and serving infrastructure on the client's cloud, not ours
  • Building drift and data quality monitoring that produces an actionable alert rather than noise
  • Versioning data, code and model weights together so any prediction can be reproduced months later
  • Making rollback a one command operation before it is ever needed

Data Engineer for AI readiness

Almost every engagement begins here, because the data is never in the shape the model needs. You build ingestion, cleaning, joining, lineage and quality checks across systems that were never designed to talk to each other. The role suits someone who finds a badly documented legacy schema interesting rather than infuriating, and who understands that fixing inputs usually moves the number more than changing the model.

  • Designing pipelines that pull from ERP, CRM, warehouse and file systems into something usable
  • Building data quality tests that fail loudly at ingestion rather than silently at inference
  • Entity resolution across sources where the same customer appears four times with three spellings
  • Documenting lineage well enough that an auditor can trace a number back to its source

AI Solutions Architect and AI Consultant

The role that decides whether an engagement should happen at all. You sit with a client, work out what is actually going wrong, assess whether the data supports a solution, and write the recommendation. Sometimes that recommendation is to buy a product or to fix a process first. This is a senior role because saying no credibly requires enough scar tissue to know what failure looks like early.

  • Running assessments that end in a written verdict, including the verdict that no build is warranted
  • Translating between a finance director's language and an engineering team's constraints
  • Sizing and sequencing a programme so value arrives before patience runs out
  • Reviewing architectures for cost, failure modes and the integration work everyone underestimates

NLP and LLM Engineer

Language work that goes beyond calling an API. Document extraction at scale, classification over messy text, entity recognition in domain specific vocabulary, summarisation with fidelity constraints, and fine tuning where a general model genuinely is not enough. A large part of the job is measurement, because language outputs are harder to score than a number and most teams do not try.

  • Building extraction pipelines over contracts, claims, clinical notes or invoices
  • Fine tuning and adapter training where a general model misses domain vocabulary
  • Designing rubrics and automated judges that make language quality measurable
  • Handling multilingual requirements without assuming English behaviour transfers

Computer Vision Engineer

Vision systems that run in physical environments rather than on clean benchmark data. Defect detection on a production line, object tracking in a warehouse, condition monitoring from drone or satellite imagery, and medical imaging support. The engineering challenge is rarely the model architecture. It is lighting, camera placement, class imbalance, edge deployment constraints and the twenty defect types that appear twice a year.

  • Training detection and segmentation models on small, imbalanced client datasets
  • Deploying to edge hardware with real latency and power budgets
  • Designing the annotation process, including what to do when experts disagree
  • Building the feedback loop that captures new failure cases from production

AI Governance and Compliance Specialist

A role that barely existed five years ago and is now a procurement requirement in regulated sectors. You build the evidence trail: model documentation, bias testing across protected groups, evaluation records, risk classification under the EU AI Act and comparable regimes, and the audit pack a regulator will ask for. It suits someone who is technical enough to read an evaluation report and rigorous enough to write the paperwork properly.

  • Running fairness and bias audits with defensible methodology rather than a single metric
  • Classifying systems by risk tier and mapping the obligations that follow
  • Writing model cards and system documentation that survive external review
  • Building the monitoring that demonstrates ongoing compliance, not compliance on one day

Conversational AI and AI Agent Developer

Systems that hold a conversation or take a sequence of actions on a user's behalf. The hard part is not the dialogue. It is the tool layer, the state handling, the escalation path to a human, and the boundary logic that stops an agent doing something expensive and wrong. Multi step agents compound errors, so most of the craft is in constraining, verifying and knowing when to stop.

  • Designing tool interfaces and permission boundaries for agents that act on live systems
  • Building escalation and handover so a customer reaches a person before they are angry
  • Testing adversarially, because users will find the path you did not consider
  • Instrumenting conversations so failure patterns are visible rather than anecdotal

AI Product Designer and AI Product Manager

Probabilistic systems break most interface conventions. This role decides how a user is shown confidence, how they correct a wrong answer, what happens when the system abstains, and how trust is built without overselling. It combines interface design with the product judgement to choose which problems are worth pointing a model at, and it works closely with whoever is building the evaluation.

  • Designing review and correction flows that people actually use rather than bypass
  • Communicating uncertainty without either hiding it or paralysing the user
  • Prioritising the small set of use cases where the model is genuinely reliable
  • Running usability sessions on systems whose output changes between runs

What working at iSpark is like

We are a remote company based in India serving clients worldwide, which produces a specific working culture. Some of it will suit you and some of it will not, so here it is plainly.

  • Client work, not a product roadmap. You will work on several different problems a year across different industries. That variety is the attraction for some engineers and exhausting for others.
  • Written by default. Decisions get written down. Long form writing is a core skill here, not an optional extra, because a remote team that does not write loses context within a week.
  • An agreed overlap window. Hours are flexible around a fixed daily overlap with the team and, on some engagements, with a client in another timezone. The window is agreed up front and kept.
  • You will talk to clients. Every role here involves explaining technical decisions to people who are not engineers. If you would rather never do that, this is the wrong firm.
  • Shipping to production matters. The satisfaction here comes from systems that survive after handover, not from benchmark scores. Monitoring, documentation and tests are part of the job, not a chore at the end of it.

We will also say what we do not offer. We are not a research lab and you will not be publishing papers on company time. We do not run an internal platform team, so infrastructure work happens inside engagements on client clouds. And because the catalogue is broad, nobody here works on a single narrow specialism all year.

Worth knowing

On using AI tools in your application

Use them. We do, every day, and pretending otherwise would be absurd. What we care about is whether you can tell a good output from a plausible one, so we will ask you about the choices in whatever you send us. An application that cannot survive a follow up question is the problem, not the tool that produced it.

How to apply

There is no application form and no tracking system to disappear into. Write to hello@ispark.biz with the role that fits, a short note on why, and something we can actually look at. Something to look at means a repository, a written technical piece, a system you built and can describe in detail, or a project writeup that explains a decision you got wrong and what you changed.

What helps: specifics about a system you took to production, what broke, and what you did about it. What does not help: a list of frameworks, a summary of a tutorial project, or a cover letter that could have been addressed to any company. We read everything that arrives and we reply, including when the answer is no.

Process

How our hiring process runs

Five stages, around three weeks end to end, with a paid trial task in the middle because unpaid work is not a reasonable thing to ask of anyone.

Step 1

You write to us

An email with the role, a short note and something we can examine. No form, no tracking system, no requirement to retype your history into a portal.

Step 2

We read the work

Someone who does the job reads what you sent, not a keyword filter. You get a reply either way within about a week, and if it is no we will say briefly why.

Step 3

A technical conversation

Ninety minutes about systems you have built, decisions you made and what you would do differently. No algorithm puzzles on a shared screen, because they measure the wrong thing.

Step 4

A paid trial task

A small, realistic piece of work of the kind you would do here, paid at a fair rate, with a scope of a few hours rather than a weekend. You keep the work either way.

Step 5

Offer and expectations

A conversation covering scope, the overlap window, how work is reviewed and what the first three months look like. Everything agreed in writing before you accept anything.

What we look for

The six things that decide an application

In roughly this order. Note that credentials are not on the list, which is deliberate rather than an oversight.

01

Something shipped and surviving

A system that ran in production and that you can describe in detail, including the parts that went wrong. One of these is worth more than five projects that stopped at a notebook.

02

Judgement about when not to build

We ask candidates to describe a project that should not have gone ahead. The people who have an answer ready are usually the people worth hiring.

03

Clear technical writing

You will write specifications, model documentation and client updates. If your writing is vague, the work will be too. We read your sample as writing, not just as content.

04

Comfort with messy data

Client data arrives incomplete, inconsistent and undocumented. Enthusiasm for clean benchmark datasets does not transfer. Tell us about the worst data you have worked with.

05

Ability to explain to a non engineer

Every role here involves a client conversation. We will ask you to explain something technical in plain language during the interview, so practise it.

06

Honesty about the limits

Candidates who describe what a technique cannot do get further than candidates who describe what it can. Overclaiming is the single fastest way to end an application here.

Fit check

Is iSpark the right place for you?

Worth reading before you spend an evening on an application, because a mismatch wastes your time more than ours.

A good fit if

  • You want to work across many industries rather than one product for years
  • You write well and do not mind that most communication happens in writing
  • You are comfortable explaining a technical decision to a finance director
  • You would rather ship something modest that runs than something ambitious that does not
  • Remote work suits you and you can hold a consistent daily overlap window

Probably not if

  • You want to publish research or work on foundation model training
  • You prefer deep specialism in one narrow technique for the whole year
  • You would rather not be client facing at any point
  • You need an office, a fixed local team around you, or on site presence
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Marked up with FAQPage schema so these answers can surface directly in search results and inside AI assistant responses.

What AI jobs are in highest demand for 2026?

Published hiring data puts AI engineer at the top, with LinkedIn ranking it the fastest growing job overall and postings reported up around 143 percent year on year. AI consultant and solutions architect follow, then MLOps and AI infrastructure, data engineering for AI readiness, NLP and large language model engineering, computer vision, AI governance and compliance, conversational AI and agent development, and AI product design. All ten are described in detail on this page.

Are these live vacancies at iSpark?

No. This page describes the ten disciplines we hire into rather than a list of open seats with a count attached. We deliberately do not publish vacancy numbers or job identifiers that go stale within weeks. Write to hello@ispark.biz with the role that fits and we will tell you honestly whether something is open now.

Are the roles remote, and do I need to be in India?

All roles are remote. iSpark is based in India and most of the team is there, which sets the core overlap window. Candidates elsewhere are considered where the overlap works in practice rather than on paper. The working language is English and there is no requirement to attend an office at any point.

Do I need a degree or a certification in machine learning?

No. Credentials are not among the six things we weigh, which is stated on this page deliberately. What counts is a system you built that ran in production and that you can discuss in detail, clear technical writing, and honest judgement about what a technique cannot do. Several of the strongest applications we receive come from people who moved across from software engineering or from a domain speciality.

What does the hiring process involve?

Five stages over roughly three weeks. You email us with work we can examine, someone who does the job reads it and replies either way within about a week, then a ninety minute technical conversation about systems you have built, then a small paid trial task of a few hours at a fair rate, then a written offer conversation. There are no algorithm puzzles on a shared screen.

Can I apply if I am early in my career?

Yes, for most of the ten roles. The two exceptions in practice are AI solutions architect and AI governance, where the job is mostly judgement and the market median sits near eight years of experience. For the engineering roles, evidence of something you built and took to production matters far more than the number of years behind it.

Think one of these describes you?

Write to us with the role that fits, a short note on why, and something we can actually look at. We read everything that arrives and we reply, including when the answer is no.